The reasons for the weakening of the Ottoman Empire are brief. The collapse of the Ottoman Empire: nothing lasts forever. Creation of the Turkish Republic

The Ottoman Empire, which held all of Europe and Asia in fear, lasted for more than 600 years. The once rich and powerful state founded by Osman I Gazi, having gone through all stages of development, prosperity and fall, repeated the fate of all empires. Like any empire, the Ottoman Empire, having begun the development and expansion of borders from a small beylik, had its apogee of development, which fell in the 16th-17th centuries.

During this period, it was one of the most powerful states, accommodating many peoples of various religions. Owning vast territories of a significant part of South-Eastern Europe, Western Asia and North Africa, at one time it completely controlled the Mediterranean Sea, providing a connection between Europe and the East.

Weakening of the Ottomans

The history of the collapse of the Ottoman Empire began long before the manifestation of obvious reasons for the weakening of power. At the end of the 17th century. the previously invincible Turkish army was first defeated when trying to take the city of Vienna in 1683. The city was besieged by the Ottomans, but the courage and self-sacrifice of the city's inhabitants and the protective garrison, led by skilled military leaders, prevented the invaders from conquering the city. Because the Poles came to the rescue, they had to abandon this venture along with the booty. With this defeat, the myth of the invincibility of the Ottomans was dispelled.

The events that followed this defeat led to the conclusion of the Treaty of Karlowitz in 1699, according to which the Ottomans lost significant territories, the lands of Hungary, Transylvania and Timisoara. This event violated the indivisibility of the empire, breaking the morale of the Turks and raising the spirit of the Europeans.

Chain of defeats for the Ottomans

After the fall, the first half of the next century brought little stability by maintaining control of the Black Sea and access to Azov. The second, towards the end of the 18th century. brought an even more significant defeat than the previous one. In 1774, the Turkish War ended, as a result of which the lands between the Dnieper and the Southern Bug were transferred to Russia. The following year, the Turks lose Bukovina, annexed to Austria.

End of the 18th century brought absolute defeat in the Russian-Turkish war, as a result of which the Ottomans lost the entire Northern Black Sea region with Crimea. In addition, the lands between the Southern Bug and the Dniester were ceded to Russia, and the Porte, called the Ottoman Empire by Europeans, lost its dominant position in the Caucasus and the Balkans. The northern part of Bulgaria united with Southern Rumelia, becoming independent.

A significant milestone in the fall of the empire was played by the following defeat in the Russian-Turkish war of 1806 - 1812, as a result of which the territory from the Dniester to the Prut went to Russia, becoming the Bessarabia province, present-day Moldova.

In the agony of losing territories, the Turks decided to regain their positions, as a result of which 1828 brought only disappointments; according to the new peace treaty, they lost the Danube Delta, and Greece became independent.

Time was lost for industrialization while Europe was developing with great strides in this regard, which led to the Turks lagging behind Europe in technology and modernization of the army. The economic decline caused its weakening.

Coup d'etat

The coup d'etat of 1876 under the leadership of Midhat Pasha, together with previous reasons, played a key role in the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, accelerating it. As a result of the coup, Sultan Abdul-Aziz was overthrown, a constitution was formed, a parliament was organized, and a reform project was developed.

A year later, Abdul Hamid II formed an authoritarian state, repressing all the founders of the reforms. By pitting Muslims against Christians, the Sultan tried to solve all social problems. As a result of the defeat in the Russian-Turkish war and the loss of significant territories, structural problems only became more acute, which led to a new attempt to resolve all issues by changing the course of development.

Revolution of the Young Turks

The revolution of 1908 was carried out by young officers who received an excellent European education. Based on this, the revolution began to be called the Young Turk. Young people understood that the state could not exist in this form. As a result of the revolution, with the full support of the people, Abdul Hamid was forced to reintroduce a constitution and parliament. However, a year later the Sultan decided to carry out a counter-coup, which turned out to be unsuccessful. Then representatives of the Young Turks erected a new Sultan, Mehmed V, taking almost all power into their own hands.

Their regime turned out to be cruel. Obsessed with the intention of reuniting all Turkic-speaking Muslims into one state, they ruthlessly suppressed all national movements, bringing the genocide against the Armenians to state policy. In October 1918, the occupation of the country forced the leaders of the Young Turks to flee.

Collapse of the Empire

At the height of World War I, the Turks entered into an agreement with Germany in 1914, declaring war on the Entente, which played a fatal, final role, predetermining 1923, which became the year of the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. During the war, the Porte suffered defeats along with its allies, until its complete defeat in 20 and the loss of the remaining territories. In 1922, the sultanate separated from the caliphate and was liquidated.

In October of the following year, the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and its consequences led to the formation of the Turkish Republic within new borders, led by President Mustafa Kemal. The collapse of the empire led to massacres and evictions of Christians.

On the territory occupied by the Ottoman Empire, many Eastern European and Asian states arose. The once powerful empire, after the peak of development and greatness, like all empires of the past and future, was doomed to decay and collapse.

In the second half of the 16th century, the ruling feudal class became an obstacle to the further growth of the country's productive forces. Waging endless wars and increasing the exploitation of the peasantry and the trade and craft classes in the cities, the feudal lords ruined the main source of Turkey's material well-being. The main reason for the weakening of the Ottoman Empire was the decomposition of the military-feudal structure of the state, primarily the Sipahi agricultural system. The collapse of the military-feudal system was accompanied by a change in the social composition of the Turkish feudal lords. Already in the middle of the 16th century, a deepening discrepancy began to emerge between the level of development of the productive forces on the main territory of the empire and the nature of production relations. This was expressed in a reduction in official non-hereditary land ownership. Lenas, gradually losing their military character, turned into ordinary feudal estates, and their holders into feudal lords. Timar arose and developed in the process of feudalization of Ottoman society, it corresponded to the early stage of its development, a period of insignificant commodity production and monetary exchange. Unlike Western European countries, Turkey was replaced by military-feudal relations with new bourgeois ones, which determined the economic and military growth of the former.

One of the important reasons for the backwardness and then the decline of the empire was the contradictions between the conquering Turks and the conquered peoples, primarily in the Balkans, with their more developed feudalism and trade and monetary relations. Throughout the entire period of stay of the Balkan peoples, as well as a certain part of the Armenians and Georgians, under Turkish yoke, they invariably maintained superiority, economic and cultural, over their enslavers. This contradiction was revealed as the economy gradually recovered and economic life revived in the conquered territories. Over time, the needs of the Ottoman feudal lords for money increased sharply, and the very way of life of the feudal lords changed. Military asceticism was replaced by a passion for luxury. And previous sources of income, primarily military booty, began to quickly deplete. Created under military conditions and for military purposes, the Sipahi system pushed the state to new campaigns of conquest. At the same time, endless wars led to the ruin of the peasantry, economic detente and stagnation, the consequence of which was the inevitable decline in the economic basis of the military power of the empire.

The formation of centralized states in Europe with regular, well-trained and armed troops did not allow the Turks to expand into new territories and led to a sharp reduction in military production. At the same time, revenues from Levantine trade fell due to the transfer of the center of world trade to the Atlantic Ocean and the reduction in the volume of commercial transactions in the Mediterranean. The growth of the liberation struggle of the Balkan peoples turned their territories into an arena of almost continuous military actions, which caused a further deterioration in both the internal and international position of the Ottoman Empire.

The decrease in military production pushed the sipahis to intensify the exploitation of the peasants attached to the land. However, the timar system could not satisfy the increased need for money, since the amount of revenue and the rights of the sipahi in relation to their holdings were strictly regulated by law. Therefore, the feudal lords began to strive to transform the timars from conditional possessions into hereditary and unconditional ones. Thus, the essence of service land ownership gradually changed. If the strict regulation of the rights of the Timariots prevented them from realizing such plans, then the privileges of the ruling nobility made it easier for them to concentrate many free Timars, who were already actual hereditary possessions, not bound by the responsibilities of the genius of military service.

Rice. 5. Siege of the Turkish fortress of Soporo by the Venetians on the island of Corfu in 1570. Engraving. Around 1572

On the other hand, this process was facilitated by the fragmentation of the Timars, which forced the Timariots to increase the tax burden, which, in turn, caused an increase in discontent among the peasantry. Representatives of the court elite first of all sought to appropriate the Timariot lands in order to be less dependent on changes in the Sultan’s mood. At the same time, more and more representatives of trade and usurious capital appeared among the holders of timars, who sought to bribe their way into positions in the state apparatus. Their appearance among the feudal lords allows us to draw a conclusion about the growing influence of trade and usury circles on agrarian relations in Turkey.

The concentration of land in the hands of the ruling elite was not the only reason for the collapse of the military-feudal system. The “unprofitability” of the timar in the eyes of its owner was no less important. The average income of a timariot provided a very low subsistence level. Therefore, military booty was so important, which tripled his income, and its reduction caused significant damage to small and medium-sized feudal lords.

The second blow was a significant drop in the value of the currency unit of the Ottoman Empire, akçe (2-2.5 times at the official rate and 4 times on the “black market”). This was due to the price "revolution" in Europe caused by the influx of cheap silver from America. While market prices and government taxes increased, the sipahis' financial income from their holdings remained stagnant. As a result, the share of timariots in the total volume of feudal rent received from peasants decreased. For example, if at the beginning of the 16th century up to 50 - 70% went in their favor collections from the rural population, then by the end of the century the share of timariots decreased to 20 - 25%. As a result, the military expenses that the sipahis borne ceased to be repaid by the taxes collected from the timars, and the feudal lords began to increasingly lose interest in their possessions. The fighting spirit and desire to fight steadily fell; out of 10 Timariots, only 1 came under the banner of the Sanjakbey.

The collapse of the military-feudal system was accelerated by the fact that, starting from the second half of the 16th century, the empire did not make any territorial acquisitions. The danger of this process for the central authorities was not only that it entailed a sharp decrease in the number of the feudal militia, which was the basis of the army, but also in its social consequences. Dissatisfied Timariots, who suffered from the arbitrariness of large feudal lords and from the actions of the central authorities, often joined the rebels, strengthening the growing separatist aspirations.

One of the first indicators of the onset of decline was the financial difficulties of the state. It turned out that the previous sources of income did not cover the growing needs of the treasury for the maintenance of the army and the huge military-administrative apparatus.

The Ottoman government tried to rectify the situation by reducing the silver content of the akce, and then by deteriorating the silver. However, the use of the damaged coin led to the final breakdown of public finances and caused tension in the internal political situation.

The Turkish feudal lords saw a way out of the crisis in intensifying the exploitation of the peasant masses.1-1° the state followed the same path. At the end of the 16th and beginning of the 17th centuries, taxes increased sharply and new taxes were introduced. The non-Muslim population suffered especially. By the beginning of the 17th century, the per capita tax (jizya) increased 5-5.5 times (from 20-25 akche to 140), and local tax collectors collected 400-500 akche. Taxes classified as “emergency” grew even faster. They were introduced by the state depending on specific, mainly military, needs, so their sizes were not precisely established.

Along with the strengthening of tax oppression, the government began to practice on a large scale the practice of renting out state land for the right to collect taxes. The expansion of the activities of tax farmers, who quickly became the true masters of entire regions of the country, meant the intensification of the predatory exploitation of the dependent population.

In the second half of the 16th century, the Timariots showed a tendency to replace natural ashar with monetary rent (“kesim”). The increase in the share of money rent had dire consequences for agriculture. Usually, the replacement of food and labor rent with cash rent occurs at a high level of commodity production; in the Ottoman Empire it was due to the increased need of feudal lords for money. Therefore, such a transition could not stimulate the development of productive forces in agriculture and only intensified the ruin of the peasantry. To pay the required amount of taxes, peasants were forced to sell not only surpluses, but also a significant part of the necessary product. Rayat was forced to resort to the services of moneylenders. This phenomenon has acquired enormous proportions, engulfing the bulk of the peasantry in bonded systems. A characteristic phenomenon was the mass exodus of peasants from villages, abandoned villages and uncultivated fields. There were frequent years of famine, especially in the backward regions of Anatolia.

In the second half of the 16th century, the ruling elite of the Ottoman Empire continued to pursue an aggressive foreign policy. However, the new wars did not bring success. In 1571, the Turks suffered a crushing defeat at the naval battle of Lepanto. In a monumental naval battle, the combined fleets of the Catholic states of Europe (mainly Venice and Spain) defeated the Ottoman fleet, sinking or capturing 224 of 277 ships. The myth of the invincibility of the Ottoman Empire was dispelled.

The Allies were unable to reap the benefits of victory, and this allowed Turkey to regain its military strength at sea by 1572. In 1573, she was able to capture Cyprus, which belonged to Venice, and in 1574, she finally ousted the Spaniards from Tunisia. The failure of the Astrakhan campaign of 1569, which required significant costs, the defeat at Lepanto testified to the beginning of the military weakening of the empire. At the end of the 16th - 17th centuries, Ottoman troops won victories more than once; in 1578, a war began with the Safavid power. As a result of the Treaty of Istanbul in 1590, Tabriz, Shirvan, part of Luristan, Western Georgia and some other regions of the Caucasus were ceded to Turkey. However, these areas were under Turkish rule for only 20 years.

The Ottoman Empire, the core of which was formed by the middle of the 14th century, remained one of the largest world powers for several centuries. In the 17th century, the empire entered a protracted socio-political crisis. In the first half of the 20th century, accumulated internal contradictions and external causes led to the collapse of the Ottoman Empire.

World War I

Why did the Ottoman Empire collapse? Even on the eve of the war, it was in a deep crisis.
His reasons were:

• the national liberation struggle of the peoples making up the empire;
• reform movement that resulted in the Young Turk Revolution of 1908

Participation in the First World War on the side of Germany and Austria-Hungary became the starting point for the collapse of the empire. The fighting was unsuccessful.

The losses were so great that by October 1918 the size of the Ottoman army was reduced to 15% of the total maximum strength (800 thousand people in 1916).

Rice. 1. Ottoman troops in Aleppo. 1914

The general situation in the country that developed during the war years speaks briefly about the reasons for the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. Irreversible damage was caused to the economy. During the war years, taxes increased significantly. This led to a sharp increase in discontent both among the non-Muslim peoples of the empire and among the Arabs (Arab revolt in the Hejaz).

Foreign occupation

In October 1918, an armistice was signed in Mudros.
The conditions were very difficult:

• immediate demobilization of the entire army and navy;
• opening of the Mediterranean straits (Bosporus and Dardanelles);
• surrender of all Ottoman garrisons, etc.

Article 7 of the armistice allowed Entente troops to occupy “any strategically important points” if this was caused by military necessity.

Rice. 2. Map.

In November 1918, the Allies captured Istanbul, dividing it into spheres of influence.

Following the capital in 1919 Other provinces were also occupied:

TOP 4 articleswho are reading along with this

• Adana (French);
• Kilis, Urfa, Marash and Gaziantep (British);
• Antalya (Italians).

In May 1919, Greek troops landed in Aegean Anatolia.

In August 1920, in Sèvres, the Ottoman Empire was forced to sign humiliating peace treaty:

• the territory of the empire narrowed to Istanbul and northern Asia Minor;
• the question of the Kurdish territories of south-eastern Asia Minor was to be decided by the League of Nations;
• all capitulations were reaffirmed.

Surrender – concessions to foreign states in the field of diplomacy and trade.

Nationalist movement

In 1921-1922 The war between Turkish nationalists and the Greeks in Anatolia continued. As a result, the Turks managed to win. The nationalists, led by Mustafa Kemal and İsmet (İnönü), negotiated a truce with the British occupation forces in Istanbul.

Rice. 3. Mustafa Kemal Ataturk.

In November 1922 the sultanate was abolished.

In July 1923, the final Treaty of Lausanne was signed, which formalized the collapse of the Ottoman Empire.

The Ottoman Empire arose in the west of the Asia Minor peninsula in the thirteenth century. In a short time, it became one of the most powerful powers of this era.

Reasons for the rapid growth of the Ottoman Empire

By the time the empire was founded, the territory of the peninsula was already inhabited by a large number of nomadic Turks. They came from Altai in several streams; this process began in the 9th century AD. The warlike Turkic tribes united under the rule of the Ottoman dynasty and began to capture more and more territory. Other Muslim tribes, such as Arabs and Kurds, also took part in the first campaigns. After Sultan Fatih captured Constantinople in 1453, he began to be viewed by many adherents of Islam as the leader of the entire Muslim world.

One of the features of the Turkish army of that time, which guaranteed them success during wars, was its modern weapons, superior to any enemy weapons. Thus, the Turks managed to capture the entire Caucasus, the north of the Caspian Sea, the Balkan Peninsula and the entire Arabian Peninsula, Egypt, and Libya. The Crimean Tatar Khanate was also dependent on the Turks. As a result, the Ottomans reached Algeria itself and began to control several seas at once:

• Red.
• Black.
• Part of the Mediterranean.
• Caspian.

This brought huge profits to the empire, because it actually controlled all trade in these regions.

Reasons for the weakening of the Ottoman Empire

However, soon, at the end of the 15th and beginning of the 16th centuries, powerful countries began to appear in the neighborhood of the Ottoman Empire, and its position in the international arena began to weaken. A strong state of Iran arose in the east, which conquered part of the Caucasus and Armenia from Turkey and cut off the Ottomans’ path to the Caspian Sea. The Austrian Empire arose in the northwest, managing to defeat the Turks and stop them on their way to Europe. Europeans found a sea route to India, and caravan routes through Turkey became irrelevant. Within the country, all non-Turkic tribes, including Muslims, began to rebel against the Sultan. Taken together, all this greatly weakened the Ottoman Empire.

For more than 600 years, the Ottoman Empire, once founded by Osman I Ghazi, kept all of Europe and Asia in fear. Initially a small state on the territory of Asia Minor, over the next six centuries it expanded its influence over an impressive part of the Mediterranean basin. In the 16th century, the Ottomans owned lands in Southeast Europe, Western Asia and the Caucasus, North and East Africa.

However, any empire will sooner or later be destroyed.

Reasons for the collapse of the Ottoman Empire

Of course, the empire does not fall apart in one day. The reasons for the decline accumulated over several centuries.

Some historians are inclined to consider the reign of Sultan Ahmet I as a turning point, after which the throne began to be inherited according to seniority, and not according to the merits of the heirs. The weakness of character and commitment to the human weaknesses of subsequent rulers became the reason for the unprecedented flourishing of corruption in the state.

Bribery and the sale of preferences led to increased discontent, including among the Janissaries, on whom the Sultanate always relied. In May 1622, during the Janissary uprising, Osman II, who ruled at the time, was killed. He became the first sultan to be killed by his subjects.

The backwardness of the economy became the cornerstone in the collapse of the empire. Accustomed to living off conquest and the plunder of its neighbors, the Sublime Porte missed the key point in changing the economic paradigm. Europe made a qualitative leap in industrial development, introducing new technologies, and the Porte still remained a medieval feudal state

The opening of new sea trade routes reduced the influence of the Ottoman Empire on trade between the West and the East. The Empire supplied only raw materials, while importing almost all industrial goods.

Unlike European states, which equipped their armies with various technological innovations, the Ottomans preferred to fight the old fashioned way. In addition, the Janissaries, on whom the state relied during the war, were a poorly controlled mass. Constant riots of dissatisfied Janissaries kept each new sultan who ascended the throne in fear.

Countless wars depleted the state budget, the deficit of which by the end of the 17th century approached 200 million. This situation caused several major defeats for the once invincible empire.

Military defeats

Back at the end of the 17th century, Türkiye began to gradually narrow its borders. According to the Treaty of Karlowitz in 1699, it lost a significant part of its lands, after which it actually stopped trying to move west.

The second half of the 18th century was marked by new territorial losses. These processes continued at the beginning of the 19th century, and in the Russian-Turkish war of 1877-78, the Porte suffered a complete defeat, as a result of which several new states appeared on the map of Europe, breaking away from its territory and declaring independence.

The final significant blow for the Ottoman Empire was the defeat in the First Balkan War of 1912-13, which resulted in the loss of almost all territories on the Balkan Peninsula.

Feeling its weakening, the Ottoman Empire begins to look for allies and tries to rely on help from Germany. However, instead it is drawn into the First World War, as a result of which it loses an even more significant part of its possessions. The Brilliant Porte suffered a humiliating fall: the Armistice of Mudros, signed in October 1918, represented an almost unconditional surrender.

The final point in the collapse of the Great Ottoman Empire was set by the Treaty of Sèvres in 1920, which was never ratified by the Grand National Assembly of Turkey.

Creation of the Turkish Republic

Attempts by the Entente countries to forcibly implement the terms of the Treaty of Sèvres, which actually dismembered Turkey, forced the progressive part of Turkish society, led by Mustafa Kemal, to enter into a decisive struggle against the occupiers.

In April 1920, a new parliament was formed, declaring itself the only legitimate authority in the country - the Grand National Assembly of Turkey. Under the leadership of Kemal, who later received the nickname Atatürk (father of the people), the sultanate was abolished and a republic was subsequently proclaimed.

After the advance of the Greek army was stopped in 1921, Turkish troops launched a counteroffensive and liberated all of Anatolia. The Treaty of Lausanne, signed in 1923, although it contained some concessions to the Entente countries, nevertheless marked the recognition of Turkey's independence in the international arena.

The six-hundred-year-old Ottoman Empire fell and on its ruins the Turkish Republic was born, which faced many years of reforms in all spheres of life.